A) A main point I read about in the article was that photo manipulation is rendering reality. Even if you don't change much about the picture, it's still not allowing the viewers to have an opinion on the true picture. People seeing the manipulated photo are seeing the altered version, so they are basing their opinion off of someone else's interpretation. B) The philosophy of major newspapers, like The Washington Post and The New York Times, is that the photojournalists are required to turn in their proof for the photos they took, as well as their final portfolio if they want their photos to be used. C) Some things are acceptable to do to an image without being unethical. For example, if there is a great picture in a magazine, and you just want to make a little bit brighter, that's fine because you're just changing the lighting so that people can better see the picture. Another example would be if you crop unnecessary objects out of a picture, like a fire hydra...
Comments
Post a Comment